Bankruptcy can leave a long digital shadow, affecting our reputation and career prospects for years. Even after we’ve moved past financial struggles, search engines may still display links to old court cases or news stories, making it hard to truly start over. This is where the “right to be forgotten” under the GDPR steps in, offering a way to have outdated or irrelevant personal data erased from public view.
With this right, individuals can ask data controllers and search engines to delete personal data about our bankruptcy if it no longer serves the public interest or is simply no longer relevant. It’s a critical tool for protecting your privacy and giving you a fair chance to rebuild your life. As more people become aware of their digital rights, understanding how the right to be forgotten applies to bankruptcy is more important than ever.
Need help protecting your online reputation? Reach out to AGR Technology for a confidential consultation
Understanding the Right to Be Forgotten

The right to be forgotten under the GDPR grants individuals the ability to request the erasure of personal data, including information about past bankruptcy. Data controllers—such as search engines and directory operators—must delete data if it’s outdated, irrelevant, or no longer necessary, provided local laws don’t require its retention. For example, when bankruptcy listings from decades ago continue to appear in search results, this right allows people to petition for their removal or suppression.
European law sets the global precedent for the right to be forgotten. Article 17 of the GDPR requires immediate and demonstrable data erasure by any data controller on valid request. Courts in the EU have specified this applies only within member states but similar decisions have appeared in Canada and Japan, making this concept increasingly recognized internationally and an important tool for online reputation management.
Practical application of the right to be forgotten for bankruptcy involves removing search links or online references to old court cases that harm current reputation or career prospects. This process supports individuals seeking resocialization and mitigates the long-term impact of financial missteps. Many companies and media organizations must comply when legitimate requests align with data protection regulations and not overriding public interest persists.
We see this right as an essential tool for privacy protection. Access to it means anyone can directly approach a search engine or site owner with a formal request for erasure. Verification steps and justification for removal—such as pointing to the outdated or irrelevant nature of bankruptcy records—form core parts of the procedure. Consistent with global privacy trends, data subjects increasingly expect control over their digital histories, especially in sensitive matters like bankruptcy.
Legal Foundations of the Right to Be Forgotten
Legal frameworks for the right to be forgotten shape how bankruptcy data appears online. This right impacts data controllers, individuals, and third parties responsible for making personal information public.
International and Regional Perspectives
International standards set key principles for personal data removal. The European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) defines the right to be forgotten as a mechanism to erase certain digital traces. In Article 17 GDPR, individuals can request deletion of personal data, including bankruptcy records, if those details are outdated or no longer relevant. EU courts, such as with the 2014 Google Spain decision, enforce this by requiring search engines to remove certain links if they cause unwarranted harm.
Other jurisdictions adopt similar frameworks in specific contexts. Courts in Japan and Canada confirm the right to request removal of personal information from search results for local residents. National implementations differ, but the precedent set in the EU influences many global discussions on digital privacy and the removal of financial history from public search engine results.
Comparison with the Right to Erasure
The right to be forgotten for bankruptcy extends from the broader right to erasure. Article 17 GDPR describes the right to erasure as an individual’s ability to demand the deletion of personal data held by data controllers—entities like media outlets, courts, or companies. The right to be forgotten, in contrast, reaches further by affecting not only the original source but also third parties who make the data available to the public, such as search engines indexing bankruptcy cases.
Unlike the absolute nature of erasure in some privacy laws, the right to be forgotten entails a balancing test. Data controllers must weigh individual privacy against the public’s right to access information. For example, the right typically applies to private individuals rather than public figures, and only if the data is inadequate, irrelevant, or excessive in relation to processing purposes. This framework supports requests to remove bankruptcy case links where the information no longer serves the public interest.
These distinctions determine how we interpret, apply, and enforce the removal of bankruptcy records and references across digital platforms and search engines.
Bankruptcy and Personal Data: What Is Collected and Stored
Digital traces of bankruptcy remain persistent because several entities collect and store related personal data. These data points extend across primary credit reporting agencies, public records, online databases and search engines.
Credit Reports and Public Filings
Credit reports and public filings hold bankruptcy data for extended periods. Credit bureaus—such as Experian, Equifax and TransUnion—store bankruptcy information for up to 10 years in the United States. Public court records also include the case number, filing date, type of bankruptcy and discharge status. Courts and government repositories then publish these filings, making them accessible for background checks, credit assessments and other official reviews.
Online Information and Databases
Online information and databases index and display bankruptcy records long after case resolution. Search engines crawl court archives, news outlets and data aggregators, linking an individual’s name to bankruptcy filings. Commercial databases—like PeopleFinder or Spokeo—routinely aggregate data from public records, often republishing old bankruptcy information with minimal barriers to public access. Forums and specialty financial sites sometimes discuss past cases, further dispersing sensitive data across the web and increasing the reach of outdated bankruptcy records. Search engine results pages frequently surface these links, compounding reputational risks and hindering digital rehabilitation efforts.
Applying the Right to Be Forgotten in Bankruptcy Cases
Applying the right to be forgotten in bankruptcy cases centers on removing outdated or irrelevant bankruptcy records from online visibility. This supports individuals as they regain privacy and restore their reputations after financial distress.
Legal Barriers and Limitations
Legal barriers affect the application of the right to be forgotten for bankruptcy in several ways:
- Jurisdictional constraints restrict the right to be forgotten primarily to the European Union’s 27 member states, so requests often apply only to searches performed within those countries.
- Public interest considerations mean courts and data controllers evaluate whether removing bankruptcy data overrides the community’s need for access to accurate historical records, especially for recent cases or public figures.
- Non-absolute rights, as the GDPR makes clear, prevent unconditional data erasure—criteria like data being inaccurate, outdated, or no longer relevant to legitimate interests must be met.
- Exemptions for legal obligations allow courts or public registries to deny erasure requests if another law mandates data retention, seen most often with official insolvency registers.
Practical Steps for Data Removal Requests
Requesting bankruptcy data removal involves several practical steps:
- Identifying data controllers: Find all search engines, news sites, and online platforms displaying bankruptcy information.
- Preparing erasure requests: Submit detailed Right to Erasure Request Forms, providing proof of identity and reasons the data meets removal criteria, such as being outdated or irrelevant.
- Responding to data controllers: Schedule follow-ups, ensuring controllers address requests within one month, as required under GDPR rules for undue delay.
- Appealing decisions: Engage with data protection authorities or courts if controllers deny lawful requests, using documented correspondence to support the case.
- Monitoring results: Check search engine indexes and third-party sites after erasure, confirming outdated bankruptcy records no longer appear for relevant queries.
This approach maximizes privacy protection and reputation recovery for those managing the consequences of financial setbacks.
Challenges and Controversies
Applying the right to be forgotten for bankruptcy sparks complex debates, especially around online privacy and public access to financial histories.
Balancing Public Interest and Privacy
Balancing privacy rights and public interest remains a core controversy in the removal of bankruptcy records. EU courts and regulators check if removing references to bankruptcy protects personal privacy more than it harms the public’s access to information. Banks, employers, and journalists depend on financial histories for risk assessment and informed reporting, while individuals argue that years-old bankruptcy listings unfairly harm reputation and chances for future employment. Legal authorities typically support erasure if data’s outdated, irrelevant, or not tied to a compelling public interest—especially when significant time has passed and rehabilitation’s likely, though they deny requests when transparency or safety outweighs privacy.
Potential Impacts on Financial Transparency
Removing or suppressing bankruptcy data online affects financial transparency and social trust. Lenders, business partners, and consumers rely on open bankruptcy records to evaluate credibility and make informed credit or investment decisions. The right to be forgotten can create data gaps, potentially exposing counterparties to unknown risks. Regulatory frameworks stress accountability, so data removal isn’t absolute—public registries and credit bureaus may retain records for mandated retention periods to preserve the integrity, fairness, and reliability of financial systems, limiting the scope of digital erasure and setting clear procedural barriers for privacy requests linked to bankruptcy.
Conclusion
As our digital lives continue to expand the right to be forgotten offers a path forward for those seeking to move beyond the shadow of bankruptcy. We believe that everyone deserves the opportunity to rebuild without outdated financial records holding them back.
While the process isn’t always straightforward understanding our rights and taking proactive steps can make a real difference. Navigating this evolving landscape empowers us to protect our privacy and shape the narrative of our digital future.
Need help protecting your online reputation? Reach out to AGR Technology for a confidential consultation
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the “right to be forgotten” in the context of bankruptcy?
The “right to be forgotten” allows individuals to request the removal of outdated or irrelevant personal data, such as bankruptcy records, from public view online. This right, established under the GDPR in the EU, helps protect privacy and enables people to rebuild their lives after financial setbacks.
How does the right to be forgotten help after bankruptcy?
It lets individuals ask for the deletion of online references to their old bankruptcy cases. Removing such information can reduce reputational harm and help improve personal and professional opportunities, making it easier to move forward.
Does the right to be forgotten apply worldwide?
Its main application is within the European Union under the GDPR. Some countries, like Japan and Canada, have adopted similar frameworks, but the right is not guaranteed everywhere, such as in the United States.
Can bankruptcy data always be erased from the internet?
Not always. There are legal exceptions, including public interest, legal obligations, and journalistic needs. Requests may be denied if the data is still relevant for public transparency or financial safety.
How long do bankruptcy records stay online?
In the U.S., credit bureaus can report bankruptcy for up to 10 years. Public court records and commercial databases may also keep such information for extended periods, making it accessible online for background checks and other uses.
What steps should I take to remove bankruptcy data online?
Identify the data controllers (like search engines or website owners), submit a formal erasure request, respond to any follow-ups, appeal if necessary, and monitor the outcome to ensure the information is taken down when possible.
What is the difference between the right to be forgotten and the right to erasure?
The right to erasure mainly applies to data controllers who hold your data, while the right to be forgotten extends to third parties like search engines that may share or display outdated personal information about you.
Why might my request to remove bankruptcy data be denied?
Requests can be denied if the data is still needed for legal compliance, public interest, or financial transparency. Authorities balance your privacy rights against the need for public access to accurate, relevant information.
Is using the right to be forgotten risk-free?
No, removing bankruptcy records can sometimes limit access to crucial financial data, affecting transparency and accountability. This is why requests are reviewed carefully, considering both privacy and public interests.
Note: The following content is not legal advice and is intended to be an informational resource for individuals wanting to learn more or request assistance with right to be forgotten requests.
Related content:
Online Reputation For Individuals
Online Reputation Management For High Net Worth Individuals
Removing Personal Divorce Records from Search Results
Source(s) cited:
[Online]. Available at: https://i.ytimg.com/vi_webp/bPy0Udg5l8Y/maxresdefault.webp (Accessed: 2 August 2025).

Alessio Rigoli is the founder of AGR Technology and got his start working in the IT space originally in Education and then in the private sector helping businesses in various industries. Alessio maintains the blog and is interested in a number of different topics emerging and current such as Digital marketing, Software development, Cryptocurrency/Blockchain, Cyber security, Linux and more.
Alessio Rigoli, AGR Technology